Ganesh Chaturthi glyphToday · Ganesh ChaturthiWishing all users of Growthifye a very happy Ganesh Chaturthi and a joyous new beginning!गणेश चतुर्थी की हार्दिक शुभकामनाएं! बप्पा आपके जीवन में खुशियाँ लाएं।Growthifyegrowthifye
GROWTHIFYE ONE-PAGER·MERC · Maharashtra·MYT·Case 104 of 2025·Order dated 2026-04-22

MERC partly allows BEST's review of its MYT Order dated 28 March 2025, correcting 5 of 10 issues; rejects 2, clarifies 3 tariff-schedule points

Case of Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST) seeking review of the Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) Order dated 28 March 2025 in Case No. 207 of 2024.

Background · what was sought

BEST sought review of MERC's 28 March 2025 MYT Order (Case 207/2024) covering FY22-23/23-24 true-up, FY24-25 provisional true-up and 5th Control Period (FY25-30) ARR/tariff. BEST alleged errors in power purchase cost treatment (non-adjustment of Rs 200.50 Cr TPC-G surplus), wrongful disallowance of certain non-DPR capex, incorrect carrying-cost methodology, computational errors in TPC-G and SWPGPL power purchase costs for the control period, and sought clarifications on three tariff-schedule definitions (agri fixed-charge units, billing demand, interest on arrears).

What the Commission decided
  • Allowed recovery/adjustment of Rs 200.50 Cr TPC-G revenue surplus (since refunded by TPC-G on 2 July 2025 as part of Rs 280.84 Cr) via PPCA in FY25-26; declined to direct holding cost payment by TPC-G without hearing it.
  • Allowed Non-DPR capitalisation of Rs 14.63 Cr for 'Replacement of Old Conventional Meters' in FY22-23 true-up (justification now sufficient); rejected Rs 4.37 Cr GIS Bus Section claim (already rejected earlier, capitalised in FY19-20, not FY22-23) and rejected Rs 1.50 Cr/year non-DPR claim for FY24-25 to FY29-30 (no scheme details) but allowed BEST to re-file with justification in next MTR.
  • Revised carrying/holding cost on true-up of FY22-23 & FY23-24 to Rs 81.25 Cr (from Rs (7.54) Cr), an impact of ~Rs 88.79 Cr, to align methodology with other licensees (e.g., ATIL Case 181/2024); to be recovered via next MTR Petition.
  • Accepted error in TPC-G power purchase cost computation for FY25-26 to FY29-30 (linkage error in hydro variable cost, incorrect quantum for Unit-5/7); allowed correction with recovery/adjustment under PPAC as per actual TPC-G invoices.
  • Rejected SWPGPL leap-year day-count correction for FY27-28 (365 vs 366 days) as not an 'error apparent'; a uniform methodology across the control period - variation to be claimed under PPAC.
  • Clarified: (a) Fixed Charge units for LT V(A)/(B) as Rs/HP/month and Rs/kW/month respectively; (b) retained existing Billing Demand definition (0600-2200 hrs) as a conscious earlier decision; (c) interest on arrears applies for 'payment made beyond 90 days from date of billing' (no 180-day upper cap).
Way forward agreed by the Commission
  1. BEST to submit detailed computation for TPC-G refund/holding-cost adjustment, Non-DPR capitalisation recovery, and revised carrying cost impact in its next MTR Petition.
  2. Impact of TPC-G and SWPGPL power purchase cost corrections (Issues I, VI, VII) to be passed through the PPCA/PPAC mechanism based on actual invoices.
  3. BEST to re-file the Rs 1.50 Crore/year non-DPR (GA) capitalisation claim with proper scheme details and justification in the next MTR Petition for prudence check.
  4. BEST may separately petition (impleading TPC-G) or raise in MTR process its claim for holding cost on the Rs 200.50 Crore delayed refund.
  5. Tariff schedule to be read with clarified units (Rs/HP/month, Rs/kW/month for LT V-A/B) and revised interest-on-arrears wording for FY25-26 to FY29-30.
  6. No further action on Billing Demand definition or Rs 4.37 Crore GIS claim - both stand as per original MYT Order.
What it means for C&I buyers, OA users & developers
  • • C&I open-access and HT/LT consumers of BEST may see minor tariff true-up adjustments via PPCA/PPAC in coming billing cycles due to TPC-G and SWPGPL cost corrections.
  • • Clarified fixed-charge units (Rs/HP or Rs/kW per month) reduce billing ambiguity for agri-linked LT categories, relevant for mixed-use or agri-adjacent C&I loads.
  • • Confirmation of 15% p.a. interest beyond 90 days (no 180-day cap) tightens payment discipline - developers/OA consumers with billing disputes should note extended interest exposure.
  • • Recognition of carrying-cost consistency principle (aligning BEST with other licensees like Adani Transmission) may set precedent useful for future tariff true-up disputes across Maharashtra DISCOMs.
Growthifye take

This is a housekeeping review order with modest but real financial pass-throughs (~Rs 200-290 Cr TPC-G related and ~Rs 89 Cr carrying cost) that will flow through BEST's PPCA/PPAC and next MTR tariff, not an independent tariff filing. For C&I/OA users on BEST's network, expect small PPCA-driven cost adjustments rather than headline tariff changes. The bigger value is procedural: MERC's insistence on consistent carrying-cost methodology across licensees is a useful precedent to cite in other DISCOM tariff true-up disputes.

Growthifye does not take responsibility for the accuracy of this information. Values are compiled from tariff orders published on the websites of State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and distribution licensees (plus CEA / MoP / Grid-India), parsed automatically and shown with their source. Always verify against the signed order before any commercial decision. This one-pager is a Vidura-assisted summary of the official order; the signed order prevails.

We use essential cookies to run the site and, with your consent, track your activity to personalise your learning and recommendations. See our Privacy Policy.